@SamuelObisesan Thank you for taking the time to improve the answer. I've accepted most of your edits, but I elected to rephrase some parts of the answer for clarity. There was one edit that didn't reflect what I meant, but that's on me for phrasing it clumsily: "You declare them [-with respect to] [+to] the owning Use Case Interactor". I see two potential ways to misinterpret this: the interface is neither declared "to" the UCI, nor is it an "interface to" (implemented by) the UCI. What I meant to say is that the design of the interface should be driven by UCI's design considerations.
↧