@aioobe No, this answer rejects the premise of the question. There's a difference. I'm not addressing the question explicitly asked, but the flaw in the underlying thinking. What you propose is an obvious enough way to be clear about directionality, I just don't think directionality is the most important thing to communicate (in the sense that the name is still very generic and doesn't tell you what the class brings to the table, and the convention starts to break as soon as there's a need to have more than one of those). It smells of an ad hoc APIs, and by extension, system.
↧